PT helps explain why gravity is so incredibly weak compared to the other forces & here is the structural reason:
Gravity is both quantised & Phenomena-wide (universal).
Gravity propagates at the Phlash Cycle (⚟ᶜ, akin to the speed of light (c) in SP).
Gravity is a quantum effect that accumulates or dissipates with the observervation points quantity of matter & mass because it is contained within each Phenomenon (quantum voxel). More localised matter produces denser/compactified higher mass regions of Phenomena due to Phluidity, which strengthens the local gravity effect. This is how PT produces both quantum gravity & general relativity's curvature-around-mass from the same structure.
Think of it this way - if every Phenomenon has the same amount of gravity, then if you have more Phenomenon in a specific region of the Phenomena you'll have more gravity in that region. (thus gravity is both quantised & relative)
So gravity is averaged across the whole Phenomena but it has higher or lower strength regionally at the same time as being the same within every Phenomenon along the entire length of 1 stretched Photon / Phield Phibre
Gravity actually diminishes over time. Due to the age of the Phenomena & the quantity of Phurlons (akin to Planck lengths in quantity, not distance, because they are stretchable),
Gravity gets diluted with each Phurlon that builds the Phenomena outwards & thus stretching each photon further relative to the observers position diluting its energy at the same rate.
Therefore from any point of observation inside the Phenomena, the observer has half the photon extending forwards to one edge of the Phrontier & half stretching backwards behind them toward the opposite side of the Phrontier.
The bigger & older the Universe/Phenomena gets the smaller gravity becomes
Gravity's strength is so small because of the vast number of Phurlons / Phenomenon from the observer to the Phenomenas Phrontier (furthest edge from where it builds outwards into the Phorum - universes edge)
A Phield Phibre is essentially a photon stretched from one end of the Phenomenon to the opposite end. but it extends past the boundaries of the Phenomenon as the Photon stretches out to the Phrontier (edge of the Phenomena)
Therefore the photon's energy is thus diluted by the width of the Phenomena when quantised per phurlon length or single Phenomenon as gravity. The full Phibre length always equals 1 photon's energy.
At the very beginning of time when there was only 1 Phulon length / 1 Phenomenon - the calculation of gravity along 1 direction of a Phield Phibre was exactly ½ the energy of a photon (it has a 2-way stretch inside the Phenomenon). But the full Phibre's gravity from Phenom to Phenom therefore is obviously 1 whole Photons worth of energy
As the Phenomena UnPhurls & the photons began stretching, their energy gets diluted along their length. Each Phenomenon's Phield represents one Phurlon of length, PT's stretchable version of a Planck length.
Note: a Phurlon is not a fixed distance like a Planck length, but the count between any two locations in the Phenomena will be the same, so SP can use Planck length counts as a proxy for Phurlon counts in any calculation.
Current gravity = half a photon's energy divided by the current number of Phurlons between the observer & the Phrontier (edge of the Phenomena / Universe)
The word "current" matters here because this value changes as the Phenomena builds / ages. Anyone attempting this calculation should also be aware that the distance to the true Phrontier & SP's observable universe edge are not the same thing. Only SP's best estimates for Planck length counts to both boundaries are likely to produce a result that meaningfully matches the current gravity measurement. If reliable observations aren't available, the calculation can perhaps be approached as a ratio: ½ photon energy divided by Phurlon (Planck length) count to the observable edge, & compared against the same ratio using the true Phrontier (universe edge) estimate (actual not just observable).
Because 1 Phurlon is revealed per Phlash Cycle it equals 1 & is thus not needed in the equation, as time & distance are the same in PT (but appearance is relative due to Phluidity).
The current number of Phurlons between the observer & the Phrontier = half a photon's energy divided by current gravity
& because 1 Phurlon = 1 Phlash in PT, N⟷ gives you both the size & the age of the full Phenomena simultaneously.
If current gravity is measurable with precision, photon energy calculable to high precision, & the Planck length calculable to high precision, the only unknown in the equation becomes the Phurlon count to the true Phrontier. That means the equation can be run in reverse to calculate the exact size of the real & full Phenomena, not just the observable bubble, & with remarkable precision. SP currently has no reliable method for this. PT may. Note this gives the distance in the direction of observation, not a guaranteed sphere, as the Phenomena is unlikely to be perfectly even in all directions.
Now I have very little understanding of maths equations but this was just my first pass at trying to explain what I see structurally. So there is a possibility that I am accidentally only taking into consideration the gravitational effect in 1 direction along 1 Phibre. If so perhaps the equation needs adjusting for the fact it would be in 3 directions for the 3 Phibres. That could mean that it needs to be times by 3. 3 times 1/2 is 1.5 or some other error that doesnt take into account directionality either by SP or PT (Example perhaps Gₜ = 1.5⚟ / N⟷ )
The following could also be pure numerical coincidence but I see intuitively that the Phields quantum of gravity might be the same thing we see in zero point energy. But I feel that maybe SP is not taking into acount the 3 Phibres for the 3 different directions (or in SP terms dimension). That means 2 factors are missing or it needs to be squared. when you square N⟷ you get 10¹²².
Could this account for SP's discrepancy in the calculations for vacuum energy?
SP theoretical vacuum energy: 10¹¹³ J/m³
SP observed vacuum energy: 10⁻⁹ J/m³
Discrepancy: 10¹²²
N⟷ to observable edge: ~7×10⁶¹, so roughly 10⁶¹
N⟷ squared: 10¹²²
So you can forgive me as this is all my first pass attempt at trying to find a way to describe what I see mathematically when my skills are only structural. I will keep tinkering with it.
This is just 100% pure speculation at this stage, but...
This is what SP sees as related to structures like the Higgs boson & the weak force.
The SP weak force may be akin to the Phield.
Zero point energy may be the quantum of gravity with the right directional factors
SP calculations may be off by either half or double or squared depending on what they calculate, as they can't see the 2-way pull, the pull away from the observer as well as the opposite pull going the other direction behind them. or the 3 Phibres in the Phenomenon volume
Phlow (magnetism in SP) stays local to the individual Phenomenon & is mediated by the Philter. It doesn't dissipate across the universe & remains looping the Phenomenon in double circuits, which is why it is many magnitudes larger than gravity, which is diluted by the full size of the Phenomena.
Gravity's cause at both the quantum level & at macro general relativistic scales is the stretched photon's pull from its origin (E), the Phen (ΦN) within the Phield of the Phenomenon.
I aim to expand this page soon but wanted to share these initial thoughts. The unification of quantum mechanics & general relativity is so important that even the possibility feels too significant to hold back.
*These are early notes to be spun off into their own pages on Wavefunction Collapse, Phlow, Entanglement & more. They are here to show how it all falls out of the same gravitational structure.*
My intuition is that gravity (in a single direction) = the amount of energy needed to collapse the wavefunction of superposition or to reduce/collapse ternary superposition into binary polarity within a single body.
When the pull of gravity within the Phield Phibre of a single Phenomenon reaches the threshold, the wavefunction collapses. It does so once per Phlash or at the speed of light & results in a polarity flip between Phenomenon entangled Phenom (what SP sees as particles).
Thus both directions of gravity form the body of the wavefunction & we can see that from the very first Phlash of the Phenomena, it took the energy of 1 whole photon to collapse the wavefunction. But that it has dissipated over time to where it stands today as a rather tiny amount of energy in comparison.
Speculation: We know that time & distance is the same in PT (Phlash & Phurlon), logic would indicate that the collapse of wavefunction would speed up over time as each tick of the Phlash cycle requires slightly less energy to "tick" as the build of the Phenomena accelerates
Speculation: Quantised gravity dilutes in strength over time as the Phenomena builds / expands. So my intuition suggests from looking at the PTM means that reduced Phield / gravity energy also means that the universe must "cool". If we play out this vision, eventually the Phenomena will have almost the entirety of it with close to zero energy but 1 very very compactified region of imensly intense energy and graviatational pull that will lead to collapse of the entire Phenomena back to a single Photon then 1 step further to the Phen. The reason being is that as gravity weakens it has a paradoxical effect. That regions of large Phress / mass will have less external gravity pulling it outwards & instead higher internal gravity which increases the Pluidty / regional mass, those higher Phress (mass) regions will be able to exert their regional gravitational effects over larger distances, compressing even distant galaxies together. Regionally the universe will become brighter, whilst universally the Phenomena will get darker. Further speculation is that if this process proves to be accurate, then it may be possible with sufficient information to maybe estimate when the Phenomena extinguishes.
The collapse of the wavefunction / ternary superposition is what generates the polarity flip that powers Phlow (magnetism) & that Phlow is perceived as an SP electron particle but is just the illusion of the polarity flipping Phlow around the Phenomenon in a Möbius strip type figure-8. The electron is not actually a particle but a quantum process.
This may be of use to unify quantum computation with binary computing.
Depending on the orientation of the Phibre, whether R, G or B, if the Phenomena tugs it a bit more on one side or another due to Phluidity, then it is more likely to collapse to that side first, but both sides would feel the tug of gravity, but it would be stronger in one direction than another depending on the relative density of the Phenomena on opposing sides. It's a tug of war with one side winning depending on which side was strongest or fattest. The rope is the wavefunction. The 2 teams & the rope are the full superposition. 1 team standing, 1 team falling.
Now we know that in the Phenomenon there are 3 ropes & 6 teams in 3 mirror pairs. All 3 ropes are fixed in the middle, so in a 3-dimensional tug of war you can see that when 1 team wins or its partner falls it would result in a chain reaction for the other 2 teams. 3 winners & 3 losers. 3 mirror pair polarities as you can see. The Phenomenon diagram even has the team colours. You'll also notice that chain reaction is what would look like the Phlow circulating around its Square Bipyramid Phenomenon structure. & as the Phenomenon are in a stacked matrix, that Phlow radiates out as an electromagnetic wave through the Phenomena.
It also connects to entanglement. Because if you follow along one wobbling but same rope & know the location of the other team you can know whether they won or lost based on whether your team won or lost. This tug of war on a Phenomena size scale means that information travels instantly. Not even as fast as the speed of light but as if information is present immediately across any distance.
When you see the PTM & it's photonic structure, you can see how everything functions & how it's is all connected. No spooky action at a distance needed.. just structural presence